How accessible this site is
I sell accessibility audits, so it would be poor form to publish a statement I hadn't earned. This one says what has been done and, more usefully, what hasn't.
Conformance status
This site partially conforms to WCAG 2.2 level AA. "Partially conforms" means most of the standard is met but some parts have not yet been independently verified. I am not claiming full conformance, because a full claim requires a complete audit against every success criterion and that has not been carried out by a third party.
| Standard applied | WCAG 2.2, level AA |
|---|---|
| Conformance status | Partial |
| Evaluation method | Self-assessment: automated testing plus manual keyboard and screen reader checks |
| Statement prepared | 27 July 2026 |
| Applies to | hynek-naceradsky.com, including the Czech version at /cs/ |
What has been done
- All text and background colour combinations tested and brought to at least 4.5:1 against WCAG 1.4.3. Interface components and form borders meet the 3:1 requirement of 1.4.11.
- Heading structure reviewed so that levels follow a logical sequence without skipping, including in the footer.
- No paragraphs styled to imitate headings — section headings are real heading elements, so screen reader heading navigation works.
- A skip link to the main content as the first focusable element on every page.
- Visible focus indicators throughout, using a 2px outline with an offset rather than removing the default.
- The services menu is a real button with
aria-expanded, operable by keyboard, closable with Escape. - Form fields have persistent visible labels associated with
forandid, not placeholder text acting as a label. - Language declared on every page with
lang, and inline foreign-language titles marked with their ownlangattribute so screen readers pronounce them correctly. - Content reflows to a single column without horizontal scrolling at 320px width and at 400% zoom.
- Decorative images have empty
altattributes; the portrait is described where it carries meaning. prefers-reduced-motionrespected — the only animation on the site is disabled for users who ask for that.
Known limitations
Being honest about these is the point of a statement:
- My CV is a PDF and has not been remediated for accessibility. It may not have a proper tag structure, reading order or document language set. If you need my CV in an accessible format, email me and I will send it as HTML or plain text the same day.
- No independent third-party audit has been carried out. Everything above is self-assessed. Self-assessment finds fewer problems than an outside pair of eyes — which is exactly the argument I make on my own audit page.
- Screen reader testing has not covered every combination. Checks were done with a subset of screen reader and browser pairings, not all of them.
- Third-party content. Fonts load from Google Fonts and outbound links go to sites I do not control. I cannot make any guarantee about the accessibility of external destinations.
Feedback
If you hit a barrier on this site, please tell me. It is genuinely useful — for you, and for the quality of the work I sell.
Email hynek.naceradsky@gmail.com with the page address and what went wrong. I aim to acknowledge within 2 working days and to fix or explain within 10 working days. If you need information from this site in an alternative format, ask and I will provide it.
Enforcement
This site is a private business site, not a public sector body, so the Czech accessibility act (zákon č. 99/2019 Sb.) does not impose a legal obligation on it. I publish this statement voluntarily. If you are unhappy with my response, you are welcome to say so publicly — for someone selling accessibility work, that is the real enforcement mechanism.
Tell me and I'll fix it
The page address and a short description of what went wrong is enough.